Barrister James McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Admitted Misconduct in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189

Barrister James McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Admitted Misconduct in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189

https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125051&currpage=T

36. Before us, Mr McGowan candidly admitted that his actions (or lack thereof) were such as to bring him within the meaning of s.18 of the CCCO. In particular, he accepted that on his part there had been undue delay as well as a repeated failure to comply with the Court's directions, which amounted to serious professional misconduct.

留言

張貼留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Abigail Wong, Parkside Chambers Barrister, Criticized by Judge Andrew Li in DCPI 1635/2019

Abigail Wong, Parkside Chambers Barrister, Criticized by Judge Andrew Li in DCPI 1635/2019 法官李樹旭批評律政司外聘的大律師黃紀怡花費一共  16  小時盤問一位證人（撇除午飯、休庭），其中有  81  分鐘用來問同一項目，認為她花費太長時間，再三提醒盤問時要實際。 https://beta.thestandnews.com/court/now- 工程人員採訪被警毆打索償案 - 律政司花四天盤問 - 官斥用 -81- 分鐘問同一項目
閱讀完整內容

Solicitor Joseph Tang Convicted of Misconduct for Delay in Paying Counsel!

Solicitor Joseph Tang Convicted of Misconduct for Delay in Paying Counsel! 鄧明輝事務律師遲找大律師費用俾香港律師會釘牌吊銷執業資格十二個月 !  點解會有事務律師唔找或者遲找大律師嘅費用咁低能？會俾香港律師會釘牌嗰喎！ Not paying Counsel's Fees or being late in paying Barristers is a serious act of misconduct punishable by suspension from practice! December 2012 - Disciplinary Decisions - Tang Ming Fai, Joseph (the Respondent) • Principles 6.04, 12.04 and 12.05 of the Hong Kong Solicitors’ Guide to Professional Conduct Volume 1 (“the Guide”) http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/tang-ming-fai-joseph-respondent
閱讀完整內容

Olympia Chambers Barrister James CC Cheng is a Useless Lawyer! 鄭從展大律師渣到死冇撚用!

Olympia Chambers Barrister James CC Cheng is a Useless Lawyer!  鄭從展大律師渣到死冇撚用 ! https://www.hkcnews.com/article/48746/ 咬甩耳朵 -48768/ // 臨近審訊尾段，辯方大律師鄭從展欲在傳召最後一名證人、精神科專家前，呈上一份專家報告，惟報告內含其他不出庭作供的精神科醫生所撰寫的內容。法官張慧玲當時認為，辯方專家不能就「傳聞證供」作供，遂要求辯方修改報告。 惟辯方經多次修訂，仍未達呈堂要求。張官對此大感不滿，認為辯方呈上的報告不妥當，因當中透露了被告過去曾用雙刀架在妻子頸上，「控方都唔提暴力事件，你冇理由自己擺上嚟呀，好唔邏輯喎」。而被告較早時在庭上自辯時稱：「我從來沒有暴力，跟太太吵架都很少，基本上只是辯論。」張官續指，一直有留意鄭大律師的表現，發現其辯護多次與被告指示不符，又提及辯方數次更改抗辯基礎，「最初打自衛已經唔合理，之後又改口打精神有問題」。 張官質疑被告的公平審訊權利是否受保障，一度提出更換律師或解散陪審團重審。張官更提到換大律師的法援安排，鄭大律師澄清自己並非法援律師，張官再斥責：「唔係法援，咁你更加唔妥啦。」 //
閱讀完整內容